Performance Evaluation of the Members the Faculty of Economics in the University of Aleppo

Performance Evaluation of the Members the Faculty of Economics in the University of Aleppo


By:

Prof. Dr. Abdulaziz Al-Dogheim

President of the University of Aleppo in the liberated areas

Prof. at the Department of Accounting – Faculty of Economics

Prof. Dr. Abdullah Hamada

Dean of the Faculty of Economics in the University of Aleppo in the liberated areas

Prof. at the Department of Statistics – Faculty of Economics

Mohamed Hassoun

Master student at the Faculty of Economics / The University of Aleppo in the liberated areas


Abstract

The paper aims to assess the performance of the members of the faculty of economics in the liberated areas from the higher study students’ points of view, and the evaluation of the department administration of their performance. The sample is of 89 higher study students. A form is used as a tool of study.

The study showed out that:

  • Essential differences found among the average of points of view of the students of Accounting and those of Administration. All the dimensions are in favor of students of Accounting.
  • No essential differences found between the evaluation of the faculty administration and the average of students’ points of view in the dimensions of (prof. personality and his attitude towards the students); essential difference found in the dimension of (the prof. efficiency with the course)
  • The average evaluation of the students to the faculty members’ performance is 3.94 with a grade of good, while the average evaluation of the administration of faculty is 4-21 with a grade of very good.
  • The statement (the prof. attitude to the student) came first, from both the students’ points of view and the evaluation of the faculty administration. The statement (the faculty members’ commitment to the requirements of the faculty administration) came last according to the administration’s evaluation. (Diversity of teaching and learning sources) came last according to the students’ points of view.

Key words: performance – faculty members – evaluating the members of the faculty– higher education quality

tibyanjournal